Compare Migration Options
Review the strengths, limitations and best fit scenarios for Planner, the PMO Accelerator and ISV solutions when retiring Project Online.
Three Paths for Replacing Project Online
Each option serves a different project type. Use this comparison to guide which tools your Light, Medium and Complex projects should move to during the migration.
Planner
Best for simple teamwork and lightweight task tracking.
- Quick adoption and minimal configuration
- Fits Light projects
- Limited scheduling and reporting
PMO Accelerator
Ideal for structured governance, templates and reporting.
- Built in lifecycle workflows
- Supports Medium complexity projects
- Strong reporting and governance alignment
ISV Solution
Best for complex portfolios that require advanced control.
- Full scheduling and dependency support
- Cost and financial tracking
- Portfolio-level dashboards
Planner
Best for Light Projects
Planner fit for light projects.
PMO Accelerator
Best for Medium Projects
Structured templates, approvals and governance.
ISV Solution
Best for Complex Projects
Scheduling, financials and portfolio-level management.
Choose the Right Path for Your Organisation
Use this comparison to decide which option aligns with your governance, reporting and project complexity needs.